With the ratification of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) by Mexico, Japan and Singapore, and the expectation that other parties will follow, we anticipate the agreement will enter into force by early next year. Although the CPTPP differs from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) due to the suspension of 22 provisions, most chapters of the new agreement remain untouched.  One of those is Chapter 3: Rules of Origin and Origin Procedures.Certificate of Origin, CPTPP, verification, ASEAN, ATIGA, Form D, self-certification, trade, customs, prepare, free trade agreement

As we get closer to entry into force, businesses should prepare to take advantage of the reduced tariffs and take steps to prepare for the new origin procedures. Under the CPTPP, the certificate of origin requirements are less onerous, do not require a specific form, require fewer data elements, and allow for self-certification. Many businesses will find this to be good news, and the simplified process is likely to facilitate trade among the eleven parties to the agreement.  However, in order to substantiate the claims, businesses should start preparing for the new requirements and put in place procedures, including recordkeeping requirements, to provide sufficient support for preferential duty claims made under the CPTPP.

Self-certification and verification requirements

The rules of origin under the CPTPP differ from the usual origin procedures that are utilized in the Asia Pacific region under the existing ASEAN agreements. For duty preference claims, the ASEAN agreements most often require a government-issued certificate of origin.  Under the CPTPP, importers, exporters and producers may “self-certify” or have the importer, exporter or producer sign the certificate of origin.

Additionally, the CPTPP self-certified certificate requires fewer data elements than what is typically required under the ASEAN agreements. Below is a chart that compares the data elements of the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) Form D to the CPTPP list of minimum data elements found in Chapter 2, Annex 3-B.

Rules of Origin, Country of Origin, CPTPP and Form D, Certificate of Origin

With the benefit of self-certification and fewer data elements comes some additional risk and exposure. This is because the CPTPP also provides for certificate of origin verification procedures, similar to an audit.  So while the self-certification may be much more efficient and streamlined, businesses will have to ensure internal compliance procedures are in place to verify preferential claims and maintain sufficient records.

What to expect under the CPTPP and lessons from KORUS

Article 3.27 of Chapter 3 states that an importing party may “conduct a verification of any claim for preferential tariff treatment by one or more of the following”:

  • a written request for information from the importer of the good
  • a written request for information from the exporter or producer of the good
  • a verification visit to the premises of the exporter or producer of the good
  • and other procedures as may be decided by the importing party and the party where the exporter or producer is located.[1]

The verification provisions provide for broad authority for requests for information as well as on site visits of the importer, exporter and producer. The language is very similar to the text of the Korea-United States Free Trade Agreement (KORUS).  And, under KORUS, we know the preferential duty claims often attract rigorous verification. We may see similar verification activity under the CPTPP, especially in countries that count on customs duty as a significant source of government revenue.

How can business prepare?

To prepare for potentially broad verifications, we recommend that businesses do the following:

  • ensure that supply contracts with importers, exporters and producers include language addressing certificate of origin signature requirements, such as clauses that require the counterparty to accurately provide the minimum data elements as well as sufficient documentation to support compliance with the country of origin requirements;
  • conduct due diligence on importers, exporters and producers to ensure that the certifying parties maintain adequate manufacturing documents and production records;
  • ensure that the exporter or producer can and will produce all information relied on for the certification;
  • ensure importers maintain records for the claims; and
  • when an importer certifies, ensure the importer maintains sufficient documentation to demonstrate country of origin.

Stay tuned for additional blog posts on how you can prepare for the CPTPP.

[1] There are additional verification procedures for textile and apparel.


Frederick Burke has over 20 years experience practicing in the area of corporate law. He served as the Practice Group Leader of the Firm’s Global WTO & International Trade Practice Group from 2006 to 2007, and has been ranked by Chambers Global as a leading lawyer in both Corporate Mergers & Acquisitions and International Trade for three successive years. Mr. Burke has also been recommended in more categories than any other lawyer in Vietnam by PLC Which Lawyer? in 2008. He is currently a member of the Prime Minister’s Advisory Council on Administrative Reform in Vietnam. Mr. Burke is highly regarded for his work on foreign investment projects in Vietnam and China for key players in the property development, trade, IT/C, and project finance areas. He provides practical advice in the related issues of securities, finance, tax, labor, regulatory compliance and dispute resolution. Mr. Burke also has extensive experience in working closely with Vietnamese legislators and law drafters on the many new laws and decrees that have been introduced to integrate Vietnam into the global economy.


Jon joins Baker McKenzie from a large retailer where he was an Assistant General Counsel, Customs and International Trade, based in their head office in Oregon. He advised the global business on import and export laws and regulations in the areas of sanctions, customs, free trade agreements, export controls and anti-boycott. He also oversaw customs audits, investigations and litigation globally, and focused on improving supply chain efficiency and managing compliance risk. In this role, he worked extensively in the Asia Pacific region. Earlier in his career, Jon worked in trade teams in the Big Four accounting firms in the U.S. and in Baker McKenzie's Hong Kong office as an Associate between 2010 and 2012. He advised technology, apparel and consumer product companies on regional customs and international trade matters over the years.


Kana is a corporate and commercial lawyer. Her practice is particularly focused on international agreements governing the cross border movement of products and provision of services, supply chain management as well as organizational restructuring. Kana has represented a broad range of multinational clients across various industries, such as consumer goods and retail, infrastructure, manufacturing and transportation. Kana also advises on various product safety, consumer protection and environmental compliance issues — including hazardous chemical substance import/export regulations, waste management issues and product lifecycle-related recycling — on a daily basis.